|
From: | lilypond |
Subject: | Re: Issue 1817 in lilypond: Bug in autobeaming 3/4 |
Date: | Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:33:54 +0000 |
Comment #8 on issue 1817 by address@hidden: Bug in autobeaming 3/4 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1817 Adding yet another view on Comment 5:Bertrand quotes Gerou that we should have r4 r8 a a a beamed as r4 r8 a [a a] in 3/4 timing, and I consider this correct. The crazy thing is, however, that I would _still_ have r4. a8 a a beamed as r4. [a8 a a] !
The reason is that in the second case, the start of the second beat goes "unmentioned", and that makes it a bad idea to mention its off-beat separately. However, if the second beat _explicitly_ gets mentioned at its start, then it does not make sense to merge its off-beat into the following beat.
So if a rest or a beam starts at beat 2, off-beat 2+ should not get its beam merged into beat 3.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |