bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Part_combine_iterator::last_playing_ not initialized


From: Dmytro O. Redchuk
Subject: Re: Part_combine_iterator::last_playing_ not initialized
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:06:14 +0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Sun 21 Aug 2011, 02:44 Dan Eble wrote:
> % valgrind reports that a member of Part_combine_iterator is used
> % before being initialized. Initializing last_playing_ = SOLO1 in
> % the constructor makes the warning go away.
> \version "2.14.2"
> 
> \partcombine { s } { s }
Added this as 1829:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1829

Thank you!


On Mon 22 Aug 2011, 00:14 Graham Percival wrote:
> IMO, please push any patch that initializes variables as long as
> they don't break a regtest.  In the worst case, you would just
> introduce a reproducible bug, instead of having us "rely" on
> having an uninitialized variable.
> 
> (if you notice broken regtests as a result of your patch, then
> let's discuss it before pushing)
Ha-ha, I've decided that type-defect and _security_ are the best for this
issue. I am in doubt. _Performance_? -- not sure. Anything else? What?-)


-- 
  Dmytro O. Redchuk                        "Easy to use" is easy to say.
  Bug Squad                                             -- Jeff Garbers



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]