[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 451 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more flexible \parallelMusic s
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 451 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more flexible \parallelMusic syntax when used with \relative |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:45:49 +0000 |
Comment #4 on issue 451 by address@hidden: Enhancement: a more flexible
\parallelMusic syntax when used with \relative
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=451
You can put a \relative around the _uses_ of the identifiers \parallelMusic
defines, and this will work as expected, with \relative pitches being
continuously linked in each Voice.
If you want linkage to be consistent in the linear source order (likely
having to jump up and down when switching voices), you have to write
something like
\parallelMusic #'(A B C D) \relative c' { ... | ... | ... | ... | }.
At the current point of time, \parallelMusic expects sequential music at
the top level. It would be comparatively simple to let it strip one
initial UnrelativableMusic layer off the music it deconstructs and tack it
back on afterwards.
If it is worth it to you, add €10 to your bill, and I'll do that. But I
think it makes more sense to relativize the resulting music variables
independently afterwards.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Issue 451 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more flexible \parallelMusic syntax when used with \relative,
lilypond <=