bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 451 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more flexible \parallelMusic s


From: lilypond
Subject: Re: Issue 451 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more flexible \parallelMusic syntax when used with \relative
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:45:49 +0000


Comment #4 on issue 451 by address@hidden: Enhancement: a more flexible \parallelMusic syntax when used with \relative
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=451

You can put a \relative around the _uses_ of the identifiers \parallelMusic defines, and this will work as expected, with \relative pitches being continuously linked in each Voice.

If you want linkage to be consistent in the linear source order (likely having to jump up and down when switching voices), you have to write something like
\parallelMusic #'(A B C D) \relative c' { ... | ... | ... | ... | }.
At the current point of time, \parallelMusic expects sequential music at the top level. It would be comparatively simple to let it strip one initial UnrelativableMusic layer off the music it deconstructs and tack it back on afterwards.

If it is worth it to you, add €10 to your bill, and I'll do that. But I think it makes more sense to relativize the resulting music variables independently afterwards.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]