[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 2308 in lilypond: Patch: Checks to see that stencil commands h
Re: Issue 2308 in lilypond: Patch: Checks to see that stencil commands have the correct number of arguments.
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:34:08 +0000
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-needs_work
Comment #3 on issue 2308 by address@hidden: Patch: Checks to see
that stencil commands have the correct number of arguments.
DCan we resolve the question of whether this is ready or not, please? There
is discussion in rather . . . blunt . . . tones which suggests it needs
work. Mike/David/Han-Wen, please update status.
Off tracker and off Rietveld discussion quoted for context:
Is there a specific reason for using a permanent Scheme variable in the C++
instead of a lookup call to the lily module? If it's just happenstance
then I'll move these structures to Scheme and access them from the Scheme
"My idea is was to abstract the concrete list away.
There is no strong reason for that though, so if you want to change
it, feel free."