[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Documentation suggestion: Including LilyPond files
From: |
Colin Hall |
Subject: |
Re: Documentation suggestion: Including LilyPond files |
Date: |
Tue, 22 May 2012 00:15:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:07:05PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> I think I stumbled over a bit of misleading or wrong information in the NR.
I agree. I had a look and found issue 391 entitled "using relative filepath in
\include "foo.ly""
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=391
It looks like this was fixed in 2009 and released in the 2.12.x series.
> Please have a look at the following documentation suggestion and
> incorporate it into the NR if you find it correct:
I haven't tested it but going by the issue tracker your suggestion
makes sense. Thanks very much for doing a thorough job.
See new documentation tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2558
--
Colin Hall