[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles
From: |
David Nalesnik |
Subject: |
Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:15:11 -0500 |
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:04 AM, David Nalesnik <address@hidden>
wrote:
>
>> Take neo-modern and neo-modern-cautionary out of the mix. My observation
> holds for neo-modern and dodecaphonic-no-repeat, which both operate at a
> staff level.
>
*Arghh* I meant neo-modern-voice, of course.