[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?
From: |
James |
Subject: |
Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better? |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Jul 2014 22:23:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
On 19/07/14 15:18, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> James writes:
>>
>>> Does it also matter that the clef is different when you run it back
>>> through midi2ly (at least it was for me running 2.19.8)
>> Yes, for 2.16.2 also.
>>
>>> I assume so in which case that is a second bug report right?
>> If so, indeed a second report. For this one, the qualification
>> of bug is even more disputable. If MIDI has a way to encode
>> clef information, then it's a bug.
> I don't think Midi can encode clefs.
>
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4018
James
- Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?, (continued)
- Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2014/07/19
- Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?, Francisco Vila, 2014/07/19
- Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?, David Kastrup, 2014/07/19
- Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?, Francisco Vila, 2014/07/19
- Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2014/07/19
- Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?, Martin Tarenskeen, 2014/07/19
- Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2014/07/19
- Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?, Francisco Vila, 2014/07/20
- Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2014/07/19
- Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?, David Kastrup, 2014/07/19
- Re: midi2ly produces 8*5, can we do better?,
James <=