[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180)
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180) |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Dec 2014 23:02:18 -0000 |
Federico,
You could revert commit 586a6d331e22d0e1a255068f07c534d219c7c902 locally or
temporarily remove that regtest from your local repository while you run your
"make doc" tests.
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: Federico Bruni
To: Trevor Daniels
Cc: Lilypond bug
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180)
Il giorno ven 26 dic 2014 alle 23:32, Trevor Daniels <address@hidden> ha
scritto:
This regtest , time-signature-single-digit.ly, was added as part of commit
586a6d331e22d0e1a255068f07c534d219c7c902 (see Issue 4176.) It causes LilyPond
2.19.15 to crash in Frescobaldi: [...] Was this regtest never executed before
being committed?!
Well, at least by the automatic doc build:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4176#c2
It seems that it doesn't occur in any situation:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2014-10/msg00071.html
For me it's very annoying because I need to run 'make doc' to check a lot of
translation updates which I'd like to commit in the next days.
If anyone knows how to avoid regtests in 'make doc' it would help a lot.
- run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), Federico Bruni, 2014/12/26
- Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), Trevor Daniels, 2014/12/26
- Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), Federico Bruni, 2014/12/26
- Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), Keith OHara, 2014/12/27
- Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), David Kastrup, 2014/12/27
- Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), Keith OHara, 2014/12/27
- Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), David Kastrup, 2014/12/28
Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), David Kastrup, 2014/12/27