Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Knut Petersen" <address@hidden>

> Yes. notation.pdf looks as if extractpdfmark/gs was not used. But the part 
> of the build log Phil published clearly proves that extractpdfmark and 
> ghostscript were used.

> @Phil: If you have a look at the notation.pdf in the build tree: is that 
> file ok or is the same broken version as published on lilypond.org?


Please see the attached outcome from piping find to ls -l.  As you see the 
English notations vary in size, and the small ones lack the embedded fonts.

--
Phil Holmes

NotationSize.txt
Description: Text document