[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mailbox (was Re: intro)
From: |
xystrus |
Subject: |
Re: mailbox (was Re: intro) |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:52:45 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:24:28PM -0500, Sam Roberts wrote:
> Do you think we should put a file named OBSOLETE in libmailbox to
> deflect those who naively assume that because the code is there its
> used? ;-) I think I got lost in there for a while, too.
Yes! Actually I think it would be better to have an obsolete
directory and move anything that is into it. Is there anything
else that is considered obsolete?
Xy
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), (continued)
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- Re: C/C++ (was Re: mailbox (was Re: intro)), Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- Re: C/C++ (was Re: mailbox (was Re: intro)), Nic Ferrier, 2002/03/13
- Re: C/C++ (was Re: mailbox (was Re: intro)), xystrus, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Sam Roberts, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Sam Roberts, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), xystrus, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro), Sam Roberts, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailbox (was Re: intro),
xystrus <=
- Message not available
- Re: intro, xystrus, 2002/03/13
- Re: intro, Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/13
- Re: intro, xystrus, 2002/03/13
- Re: intro, Sam Roberts, 2002/03/13
- Re: intro, xystrus, 2002/03/15