[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSUB failure
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: LSUB failure |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Apr 2002 06:39:51 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:29:53PM +0300, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
> > What does the WU-imapd returns? I can not check unfortunately.
> > Probably many clients expect the "OK LSUB completed" response.
> > And "NO .." means some fatal error
> I have just checked Cyrus imapd-2.0.5. It always returns OK response
> on LSUB.
Result: OK - lsub completed
NO - lsub failure: can't list that reference or name
I'm just trying to figure out from the RFC what the Right Answer is.
If we say that "can't list" is different than "empty set", then I
think OK should be returned.
But if I need to harrass the Evolution folks to get them to accept a
'no' there gracefully, I can do that.
--
"Frankly, trying to turn Windows into a decent educational software
development platform is about as fun as jumping naked into a pit of
rabid wolves."
- As seen on slashdot