Re: [bug-mailutils] Re: Branching for 0.5 (was: i18n issue)

[Alain Magloire]

> 
> Alain Magloire <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Planning to branch/tag also ?
> 
> No, since branching is almost always counter-productive. It is
> nearly impossible to merge the two branches afterwards, without
> hurting their functionality and without introducing new bugs.
> 
> Of course, as always I have tagged the sources after the release,
> just in case :) But we'd better avoid branching. 
>  

Ok.

> > I need to break stuff .. 8-)
> 
> Go ahead :)
> 

8-), I'll be doing that starting next week.

> > The iterator_t object is unfortunately tied with the list_t implementation
> > where it should not be IMHO.  I need a pure abstract iterator_t that
> > could be implement on other things the a list.
> 
> Yeah, I remember I have promised you to implement it this way. I'll try
> to finish it before the weekend.
> 

Cool, thanks.  It will allow me to move foward on some issue.