[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 'How makefiles are remade'
From: |
Jim |
Subject: |
Re: 'How makefiles are remade' |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:01:29 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) |
Noel Yap wrote:
It would help if you can post a /minimal/ makefile that demonstrates the
problem.
right here - there is no fewer statements that can be done to make a
makefile which creates a makefile which creates a makefile (and no
that's not redunant). It was a attached - here it is done verbatim.
I suppose I can strip off the remake - since if make actually worked, it
would be unessecary....
.PHONY: all
all: ;
include ticks
ticks: Makefile bob dillon
@echo TICKS=$(patsubst %ILI,%L,$(patsubst %XXXXIX,%IL,$(patsubst
%IXI,%X,$(patsubst %VIV,%IX,$(patsubst %IVI,%V,$(patsubst
%IIII,%IV,$(TICKS)I))))))>ticks
@echo Prior Ticks : $(TICKS)
include x
bob dillon:
@echo . >$@;
x:Makefile bob dillon
@echo include y >x
@echo y: $@ $? >>x
@echoto -c x @echo fakeall: \>y
@echoto -c x @./echoto -c y @echo hey we made it:$(TICKS)
Makefile: ;
- 'How makefiles are remade', Jim, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade', Noel Yap, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade', Jim, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade', Noel Yap, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade',
Jim <=
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade', Noel Yap, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade', Paul D. Smith, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade', Jim, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade', Noel Yap, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade', Jim, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade', Noel Yap, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade', Jim, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade', Noel Yap, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade', Jim, 2004/04/21
- Re: 'How makefiles are remade', Paul D. Smith, 2004/04/21