[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC]serialize the output of parallel make?

From: Chiheng Xu
Subject: Re: [RFC]serialize the output of parallel make?
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:28:01 +0800

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Philip Guenther <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Chiheng Xu <address@hidden> wrote:
> ...
>> My suggestion is that you can implement it as an optional command line
>> option(like -j), and on one or two primary platforms(Linux/Windows),
>> instead of on all platforms.
> So, the complexity of both possibilities.  You're writing, debugging,
> and contributing this code yourself?

Nop, I'm not maintainer of make,  just a user :)  .

> (I would hope that this wouldn't require any Linux-specific code;
> perhaps you meant "POSIX & Windows"?)


> ...
>> The scenario like "make -j4 2>/dev/null" may be very rare, but
>> scenario like "make -j4  2>&1 |  tee output.txt" may be common.
> And what, exactly, are you suggesting that make do to reflect that
> guess about usage patterns?
> Philip Guenther

I mean, normal user of make does not differentiate stdout or stderr
very seriously, they see them both as "output". They want serialized
"output",  whether or not it's stdout or stderr.

Chiheng Xu

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]