[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Options: `--dry-run' should prevent `--touch' from touching
From: |
Michael Witten |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Options: `--dry-run' should prevent `--touch' from touching |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:49:31 -0500 |
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 00:00, Paul Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 03:52 -0500, Michael Witten wrote:
>> > Thus, it makes most sense for `--dry-run' (`-n') to mask `--touch' (`-t')
>> > rather than the other way around (which is the current, buggy, unexpected,
>> > possibly ruinous behavior).
>
> This patch seems correct to me.
Is this discussions finished then?
- Re: [PATCH] Options: `--dry-run' should prevent `--touch' from touching,
Michael Witten <=