|Subject:||Re: Dynamic objects (was: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82)|
|Date:||Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:40:46 +0100|
> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:19:09 +0100
> From: Tim Murphy <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden>, "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
>How can one deal with them? The underlying OS is not easily
> > 2. The fact that the dynamic object's file extension (.so) is exposed
> > to the Makefile is unfortunate, because it will hurt portability of
> > Makefiles: the extension on Windows is .dll. Can we omit the
> > extension and append it internally?
> "load" allows one to build the plugin from within the makefile so you have
> to deal with platform specific problems right there.
detectable by Make.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|