[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Error: The FATs aren't big enough to describe all clusters!
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: Error: The FATs aren't big enough to describe all clusters! |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:45:45 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:45:48AM -0700, Robert Rosenbaum wrote:
> (parted) check 1
> Error: The FATs aren't big enough to describe all
> clusters! Each FAT is 19076 sectors. There
> are 2442286 clusters, which would require each FAT to
> be 19081 sectors. This is REALLY weird.
> You might want to write us an email:
> address@hidden
> It is the active partition on the boot disk. The
> partition was formatted for Windows 98, and windows 98
> runs fine on it. I subsequently installed Windows
> 2000 on the same filesystem, and I can boot both OS's
> using the W2K boot loader.
Fascinating!
Could you run chkdsk in Windows? It should give some statistics.
Could you cut&paste...?
> Curious thing... using parted to toggle the LBA flag
> did not work. It actually toggled the boot flag
> instead.
Strange. You're using and old version... could be a bug...?
Don't remember such a bug, and nothing in the changelogs...
Thanks!
Andrew