[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?
From: |
H. J. Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs? |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:19:32 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 08:18:17AM +1000, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:06:48AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > Kernel reports
> >
> > Aug 26 10:42:15 hlu kernel: hda: 156355584 sectors (80054 MB) w/1819KiB
> > Cache, CHS=9732/255/63, UDMA(66)
>
> Is that the same kernel you used to create the other partition?
>
The kernel may be different. But they report the same:
hda: 156355584 sectors (80054 MB) w/1819KiB Cache, CHS=9732/255/63, UDMA(66)
H.J.
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, (continued)
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Pixel, 2002/08/27
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/08/28
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/08/28
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/08/28
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/08/28
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/08/29
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, H. J. Lu, 2002/08/29
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Andrew Clausen, 2002/08/29
- Re: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?,
H. J. Lu <=
RE: Why check legacy partition table for non-legacy HDs?, Matt_Domsch, 2002/08/28