[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --enable-part-static
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: --enable-part-static |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Dec 2002 08:57:43 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 10:59:48AM -0500, TenThumbs wrote:
> I see you know that it segfaults. It's actually the dynamic linker
> looping and running out of stack space. Parted never runs.
>
> This is happening because you're linking the wrong way. You should be
> using -Bstatic to tell ld when to switch to static linking and -Bdynamic
> to switch back.
>
> Here's a test script that illustrates the method.
>
> #!/bin/sh
> /usr/new/gcc3.2.1/bin/gcc -g -Wall -W -O -D_REENTRANT \
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" \
> -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -W -Wall -Wno-unused -Wno-switch \
> -Wno-format -Werror -o parted command.o parted.o strlist.o ui.o \
> ../libparted/.libs/libparted.a \
> -Wl,-Bstatic -luuid -lreadline -ldl -lncurses -Wl,-Bdynamic \
> "$@"
>
> If you omit -Bdynamic then the implicit -lc will also be statically
> linked which may be a feature.
Ah, interesting. Thanks for that!
Any ideas how to make that work with libtool/automake?
I guess I should stick these flags in parted_LDADD rather than
parted_LDFLAGS, so I can control the ordering.
I wonder if there are portability issues? Not that we support
anything other than GNU[/Linux] ATM.
Cheers,
Andrew