Re: PED_MICRO_VERSION, PED_INTERFACE_AGE, PED_BINARY_AGE in configure.in

[K.G.]

On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:40:05 +0100, Patrick Leslie Polzer <address@hidden> 
wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:06:56 +0100
> K.G. <"K.G." <address@hidden>> wrote:
> 
> > I think you forgot to update both PED_INTERFACE_AGE and
> > PED_BINARY_AGE in configure.in when you released 1.6.25.
> Oh dear, I'm sorry. In all the haste this has escaped me :(
> I agree with Otavios suggestions.

All right, let's do that. Then 1.6.26 will be set source and 
binary incompatible with previous versions, so we'll be sure
it can't break things with neither 1.6.25 nor 1.6.25.1 (and
maybe people are already using 1.6.25 so i think this is
necessary).
Hopefuly with the big changes that will go in 1.6.26 this
will be the case (or almost the case at the very least ;)
I'll prepare a tag and then ask for review, then for release.
I think there's no problem in displaying Parted 1.6.25 at the
start of 1.6.25.1 because the code don't change, but if
somebody thinks it's better I could directly add ".1" in
the source (i don't think autoconf stuffs support x.y.z.t).

Guillaume