[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16231: [PATCH 0/9] Refactored loop fixes
From: |
Phillip Susi |
Subject: |
bug#16231: [PATCH 0/9] Refactored loop fixes |
Date: |
Wed, 07 May 2014 21:32:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 05/07/2014 06:49 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> NAK. These make a pile of the tests fail:
>
> ========================================== GNU parted 3.1:
> tests/test-suite.log ========================================== #
> TOTAL: 77 # PASS: 27 # SKIP: 35 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 15 # XPASS:
> 0 # ERROR: 0 .. contents:: :depth: 2
>
> looks like at least one core dump in the mix.
Something weird is going on.. as I mentioned before, I get that odd
gnulib error after the first 3 sector size passes in a make check that
seems to be a bug in the build scripts, but the first three all pass:
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for GNU parted 3.1.98-c457
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 77
# PASS: 63
# SKIP: 13
# XFAIL: 1
# FAIL: 0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/psusi/parted'
GEN public-submodule-commit
Stopping at 'gnulib'; script returned non-zero status.
maint.mk: found non-public submodule commit
make: *** [public-submodule-commit] Error 1
And then I manually run make check-recursive to get the 512 byte
sector size:
============================================================================
Testsuite summary for GNU parted 3.1.98-c457
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 77
# PASS: 75
# SKIP: 1
# XFAIL: 1
# FAIL: 0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
============================================================================
Can you look into why/what fails on your system? I also notice yours
says version 3.1 while mine is 3.1.98-c457. Did you check out 3.1
instead of master and then not run bootstrap/configure after applying
the patches?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTat69AAoJEI5FoCIzSKrw+hQH/2WyE97Vu7FADHoOo9tIl3ht
bzkj2v9j9B/y0LM1dbfhUsNfOjVHFAgIpV6fVjBTS/xVFruvbGSo11WjcFsXnAGr
8PU6FW53+Sx+ELaREoJ5iLEgR37Q9cM4pbR1sGjFzAfy5yRtrGXKjee3KuEced1q
N6FrbLgV2ARdTV+BHbMMy8rtjPPU1KqC/j43NlQ6jEJm19tOT08cXDReLpofzjMf
6mErkN3in9u4n5QW5M+3We2/qeA2wMV8IzKb4Xoe1/S+yXCtCJf1YYOHGyWGH3rL
6Uf5JNHY0CdEpRpfSU37lC1g0yOWTZnhXOJmpAwfCVf7fSRkp501fmHlHB5UxlU=
=vd3Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- bug#16231: [PATCH 2/9] libparted: remove old partitions *first* before adding new ones, (continued)
- bug#16231: [PATCH 2/9] libparted: remove old partitions *first* before adding new ones, Phillip Susi, 2014/05/02
- bug#16231: [PATCH 9/9] tests: test loop labels, Phillip Susi, 2014/05/02
- bug#16231: [PATCH 3/9] libparted: remove all old partitions, even if new label allows less, Phillip Susi, 2014/05/02
- bug#16231: [PATCH 1/9] libparted: don't detect fat and ntfs boot sectors as dos MBR, Phillip Susi, 2014/05/02
- bug#16231: [PATCH 6/9] partprobe: do not skip loop labels, Phillip Susi, 2014/05/02
- bug#16231: [PATCH 7/9] libparted: give correct partition device name on loop labels, Phillip Susi, 2014/05/02
- bug#16231: [PATCH 5/9] libparted: don't create partition on loop label, Phillip Susi, 2014/05/02
- bug#16231: [PATCH 8/9] libparted: don't trash filesystem when writing loop label, Phillip Susi, 2014/05/02
- bug#16231: [PATCH 4/9] libparted: fix loop labels to not vanish, Phillip Susi, 2014/05/02
- bug#16231: [PATCH 0/9] Refactored loop fixes, Brian C. Lane, 2014/05/07
- bug#16231: [PATCH 0/9] Refactored loop fixes,
Phillip Susi <=
- bug#16231: [PATCH 0/9] Refactored loop fixes, Brian C. Lane, 2014/05/08
- bug#16231: [PATCH 0/9] Refactored loop fixes, Phillip Susi, 2014/05/19
- bug#16231: [PATCH 0/9] Refactored loop fixes, Brian C. Lane, 2014/05/21
- bug#16231: [PATCH 0/9] Refactored loop fixes, Phillip Susi, 2014/05/22
- bug#16231: [PATCH 0/9] Refactored loop fixes, Brian C. Lane, 2014/05/22
- bug#16231: [PATCH 0/9] Refactored loop fixes, Phillip Susi, 2014/05/22