[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness
From: |
Ralph Schleicher |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness |
Date: |
17 Apr 2004 10:27:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Roger Leigh <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm using the patch I posted. If and when anyone complains, I'll
> instruct them to build and install the latest GNU tar (or build it for
> them). I require the functionality for long pathnames, and I don't
> want to have to support broken tools. For my needs, 99 chars is not
> at all sufficient.
Have you ever considered using 'cpio -H ustar' instead of tar?
--
Ralph
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/04/19
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/04/19
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/04/19
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/04/19
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/04/19
Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, Roger Leigh, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness,
Ralph Schleicher <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, Roger Leigh, 2004/04/17
- Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2004/04/18
Re: [Bug-tar] Re: AMTAR brokenness, Gunnar Ritter, 2004/04/19