bug-tar
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-tar] Is --listed-incremental needed when restoring a full backu


From: Rob Browning
Subject: Re: [Bug-tar] Is --listed-incremental needed when restoring a full backup?
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:30:08 -0600
User-agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

Sergey Poznyakoff <address@hidden> writes:

>> or do you need to keep the foo.snap file around and specify
>> --listed-incremental=foo.snap during the extract?
>
> Yes, you should use --listed-incremental when extracting as well.

OK, so even if I decide at some point that I want to delete all the
old incrementals and just keep the full backup, will I still need to
keep the full backup's snaphot file around?

I ask because for at least some commands, the docs mention that
although you need the --listed-incremental=SNAP option, the contents
of SNAP aren't important, i.e. --listed-incremental=/dev/null is fine
for --list.  I didn't know if extracting a full backup was also one of
those cases.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592  F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]