[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] Is --listed-incremental needed when restoring a full backu
Re: [Bug-tar] Is --listed-incremental needed when restoring a full backup?
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:30:08 -0600
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
Sergey Poznyakoff <address@hidden> writes:
>> or do you need to keep the foo.snap file around and specify
>> --listed-incremental=foo.snap during the extract?
> Yes, you should use --listed-incremental when extracting as well.
OK, so even if I decide at some point that I want to delete all the
old incrementals and just keep the full backup, will I still need to
keep the full backup's snaphot file around?
I ask because for at least some commands, the docs mention that
although you need the --listed-incremental=SNAP option, the contents
of SNAP aren't important, i.e. --listed-incremental=/dev/null is fine
for --list. I didn't know if extracting a full backup was also one of
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4