[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] Verify option not working with incremental backups
From: |
Joerg Schilling |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] Verify option not working with incremental backups |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jul 2007 17:50:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
nail 11.22 3/20/05 |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Since when ? It's been a long standing practice to use an old message to
> > get
> > the address for the new one. If someone has developed some new threading
> > mechanisim that breaks standing practice, fix that.
>
> At least since RFC 822 standardized the In-Reply-To: and References:
> headers, way back in 1982 (ie. longer than the 20 years you claim to have
> been using email). For example, your most recent mail stated:
This header has been introduced and standardized for usenet news.
It was not in use for e-mail until very recently.
Jörg
--
EMail:address@hidden (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
address@hidden (uni)
address@hidden (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
[ping] Re: [Bug-tar] memleak in paxutils, Eric Blake, 2007/07/30