[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad makeinfo slowdown
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: bad makeinfo slowdown |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Nov 2010 04:12:50 -0500 |
> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:13:32 +0100
> From: Patrice Dumas <address@hidden>
>
> The overhead of doing the tree instead of just parsing the Texinfo
> and converting on the fly is certainly very minor in any case. The
> slowdown comes using perl, in my opinion
If somebody wants to be serious about speeding up the new
implementation, then this assumption should be verified and backed up
by profiling, IMO. Unless Perl implementation of string comparison is
50 times slower than C, I would be hard pressed to believe that using
Perl is the main reason for the slowdown. Because the original C
implementation of makeinfo did little except comparing fixed strings
and walking in-memory strings character by character, for the
"parsing" part.
- bad makeinfo slowdown, Per Bothner, 2010/11/06
- Re: bad makeinfo slowdown, Karl Berry, 2010/11/06
- Re: bad makeinfo slowdown, Per Bothner, 2010/11/07
- Re: bad makeinfo slowdown, Patrice Dumas, 2010/11/07
- Re: bad makeinfo slowdown, Karl Berry, 2010/11/07
- Re: bad makeinfo slowdown, Per Bothner, 2010/11/07
- Re: bad makeinfo slowdown, Patrice Dumas, 2010/11/08
- Re: bad makeinfo slowdown,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: bad makeinfo slowdown, Patrice Dumas, 2010/11/08
- Re: bad makeinfo slowdown, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/11/08
- Re: bad makeinfo slowdown, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/11/08
- Re: bad makeinfo slowdown, Karl Berry, 2010/11/08
Re: bad makeinfo slowdown, Patrice Dumas, 2010/11/07