|
From: | Daniel Stenberg |
Subject: | [Bug-wget] C99 vs C89 |
Date: | Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:12:30 +0100 (CET) |
User-agent: | Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
Let's be realistic, is there any platform/system (with more than 3 users) where C99 is a problem?
What parts of C99 are that attractive that you really need to use them and give up C89 compliance?
I author and maintain several C libraries and tools and I know for sure that I am not even close to go C99 with them for the following reasons:
1. C99 doesn't add anything I've found really necessary for these projects. Ie it has been trivial or easy to remain C89 compliant. 2. Lots of older/legacy systems come with pre-C99 compilers, and forcing these users to upgrade compiler first is not on my agenda. 3. Visual Studio is more or less a defacto compiler to many windows users and it doesn't support C99 -- / daniel.haxx.se
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |