Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ruby benchmarks for Parrot

[ptkwt]

Dan,

It's good to hear that objects are at least partly working in Parrot now.

So this benchmarking you're doing is to compare the current implementation of
Ruby against a future Ruby/Parrot?

Also, where should we head over to?

Finally, I'm kind of surprised that this list still works.  Just to update
anyone who is still on this list, we've moved the Cardinal project over to
Rubyforge ( http://rubyforge.org/projects/cardinal/ ).  There's a preliminary
cardinal (0.0.1) over there.  The focus right now has to be on the frontend. 
There has been some discussion of which parser to use (ripper, ruth, rockit's)
so the current preliminary cardinal allows you to choose the one you want to use
until we can settle on one.  Thanks to Mark Sparshatt for doing all the work so 
far.

Phil

> Folks,
> 
> Now that we've got objects at least partly working for Parrot, we're 
> starting to collect up some benchmarks in various languages to see 
> where we've gotten it horribly wrong. We've got parrot and perl 
> covered well, so that's not a problem. A few folks are pitching in on 
> the ruby and python end of things, but more eyes and fingers are 
> always good, so if you're still interested now'd be a good time to 
> head over and take a look.
> -- 
>                                          Dan
> 
> --------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
> Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
> address@hidden                         have teddy bears and even
>                                        teddy bears get drunk
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cardinal-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cardinal-dev