Re: [Chicken-hackers] better hash function

[minh thu]

2008/3/19, felix winkelmann <address@hidden>:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:26 AM, Alex Shinn <address@hidden> wrote:
>  >
>  >  The average running times (running four times and discarding
>  >  the initial) were:
>  >
>  >     Original: 1.573 seconds
>  >     FAQ Hash: 1.220 seconds
>  >     FNV Hash: 1.162 seconds
>  >
>
>
> Well, commit it!

Hi,

Would it be easy to try out other ones ? Maybe you'd be interested in
http://murmurhash.googlepages.com/
or
http://cmph.sourceforge.net/

Cheers,
thu