[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix unsafe specializations in types.db
|
From: |
John Cowan |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix unsafe specializations in types.db |
|
Date: |
Sun, 6 Sep 2015 17:10:51 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Moritz Heidkamp scripsit:
> The only one I'm a bit unhappy about is `move-memory!' as I couldn't
> find a safe inline version of it. Does anyone have a clue whether there
> is such a thing already?
Presumably that would check lengths only while leaving types to be validated
by the scrutinizer?
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan address@hidden
"Any legal document draws most of its meaning from context. A telegram
that says 'SELL HUNDRED THOUSAND SHARES IBM SHORT' (only 190 bits in
5-bit Baudot code plus appropriate headers) is as good a legal document
as any, even sans digital signature." --me