[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove the `any?` procedure
|
From: |
Peter Bex |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove the `any?` procedure |
|
Date: |
Sun, 10 Sep 2017 12:53:17 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 01:05:31PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Here's a very simple one, removing `any?` (since `constantly` can
> provide the same thing easily enough).
Thanks, this procedure has always bothered me: I tend to get confused
between SRFI-1 any and this one, and it seems overly specific to have
something like this when we also have `constantly` and you can always
just write a lambda that always returns #t.
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature