[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-janitors] #636: irregex behaves different on some machines
From: |
Chicken Trac |
Subject: |
[Chicken-janitors] #636: irregex behaves different on some machines |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Jul 2011 20:20:32 -0000 |
#636: irregex behaves different on some machines
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: sjamaan | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: 4.8.0
Component: core libraries | Version: 4.7.x
Keywords: irregex |
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
We haven't figured out the cause or anything else yet, but on my NetBSD
box, I get the following (expected and correct output):
{{{
#;1> (use irregex)
; loading library irregex ...
#;2> (irregex-match
'(seq (* white) (submatch (+ print))
(* white) ":" (+ white)
(submatch (+ print)) (* white))
"io:event-dispatch")
#f
}}}
On call-cc.org (and on another of Mario's machines which is x86-64 Linux)
we get this:
{{{
#;1> (use irregex)
; loading library irregex ...
#;2> #;2> (irregex-match
'(seq (* white) (submatch (+ print))
(* white) ":" (+ white)
(submatch (+ print)) (* white))
"io:event-dispatch")
#<regexp-match (2 submatches)>
#;3> (irregex-match-substring #2 1)
"i"
#;4> (irregex-match-substring #2 2)
#f
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/636>
Chicken Scheme <http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/>
Chicken Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.
- [Chicken-janitors] #636: irregex behaves different on some machines,
Chicken Trac <=
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #636: irregex behaves different on some machines, Chicken Trac, 2011/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #636: irregex behaves different on some machines, Chicken Trac, 2011/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #636: irregex behaves differently with overlapping character sets on some machines (was: irregex behaves different on some machines), Chicken Trac, 2011/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #636: irregex behaves differently with overlapping character sets on some machines, Chicken Trac, 2011/07/08
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #636: irregex behaves differently with overlapping character sets on some machines, Chicken Trac, 2011/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #636: irregex behaves differently with overlapping character sets on some machines, Chicken Trac, 2011/07/10
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #636: irregex behaves differently with overlapping character sets on some machines, Chicken Trac, 2011/07/12
- Re: [Chicken-janitors] #636: irregex behaves differently with overlapping character sets on some machines, Chicken Trac, 2011/07/13