Re: [Chicken-users] ideas

[Peter Keller]

On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 04:10:01PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Peter Keller <address@hidden> writes:
> > Well, my point is, why use a derivative of (La)Tex, which scribe and
> > texinfo are, if you could just use LaTeX itself with all of the features
> > it has not being limited in any way. I mean, if you replace @ with \
> > in Texinfo, it basically IS TeX--but limited.
> 
> You can escape to "normal" TeX if you like. I agree that it is more
> limited than one would like, but it seems in many ways like the path
> of least resistance, for good or ill. :(

Well, so be it then. I guess I'll concede to Texinfo since it appears
to be the majority. But I still think LaTeX is what we should have
chosen. *grin*

Now, more importantly, what does felix choose after reading our
scribblings about the various formats we know and love? :)

-pete

P.S. If it isn't painfully obvious through this discussion, I'm a diehard
vim user who hates info pages. You won't get a religious war out of me
over it though.