[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent
From: |
Peter Keller |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:41:29 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2i |
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 09:02:34AM +0200, felix wrote:
> >
> > So, what is the verdict about this?
>
> Opps, Sorry. I'm a bit slow these days (lots of work).
> So what do you need:
> 1) s64vector/u64vector-support for SRFI-4
Don't need this..
> 2) A foreign type ìnt64/unsigned-int64
Don't quite need this.
3) A foreign type for long pointer/unsigned long pointer.
This is what I need.
See, you can't automatically assume long is 64 bits. Sometimes it is,
sometimes it isn't.
Although, I could very well be misunderstanding the solution you've given
and what you've said just might be perfect.
> There are some minor troubles that make this not quite trivial
> (it has to compile at least on gcc and msvc; and the handling of
> those data types needs some special work when transforming
> arguments/results to foreign code. A 64 bit integer would necessarily
> be passed as a float, since I don't want to add another basic
> numeric type - that would need a complete re-write of all
> procedures that handle numbers)
ok.
-pete
- [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent,
Peter Keller <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Perry E. Metzger, 2002/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, felix, 2002/08/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] long pointer equivalent, Peter Keller, 2002/08/26