[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] compile-time eval-time mismatch
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] compile-time eval-time mismatch |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Dec 2004 18:47:02 +0100 |
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:32:03 -0500, Michele Simionato
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:59:15 +0100, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> > So it's like an interpreter with the
> > intermediate representation being machine code.
>
> Aha! I understand many things now. BTW, is there any difference between this
> and
> Just-In-Time compilation? They seem very similar ideas.
>
Yes, it's exactly the same.
cheers,
felix
- Re: [Chicken-users] State machine using call/cc, (continued)
Re: [Chicken-users] compile-time eval-time mismatch, Michele Simionato, 2004/12/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] compile-time eval-time mismatch, felix winkelmann, 2004/12/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] compile-time eval-time mismatch, Michele Simionato, 2004/12/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] compile-time eval-time mismatch, felix winkelmann, 2004/12/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] compile-time eval-time mismatch, Michele Simionato, 2004/12/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] compile-time eval-time mismatch, Michele Simionato, 2004/12/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] compile-time eval-time mismatch, felix winkelmann, 2004/12/08
Re: [Chicken-users] compile-time eval-time mismatch,
felix winkelmann <=