[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] sharp-sign read syntax ruins bootstrap?
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] sharp-sign read syntax ruins bootstrap? |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 07:27:13 +0100 |
On 11/1/05, Brandon J. Van Every <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> README.darcs says that any Chicken tarball 1.92 or greater should be
> sufficient for a bootstrap. Is this not true in practice anymore?
>
Indeed - you'll need a newer version of Chicken. I'll upload
a new tarball tonight, I promise!
cheers,
felix