[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] Windows binary manifest
From: |
Brandon J. Van Every |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] Windows binary manifest |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Feb 2006 06:28:12 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) |
I am looking at chicken-2.216-win32.zip with an eye towards duplicating
its contents using a CMake build. I am wondering about the following:
- is a flat directory structure really what's wanted? I had thought
/bin, /include, /lib, /man directories would be more reasonable. What
is standard practice? I don't see a reason for the Windows distro to be
"different" than other platforms.
- there's a csi-static.exe but no csc-static.exe. Is the latter desired?
- do you really want chicken.dll, chicken_gui.dll, and uchicken.dll? As
opposed to libchicken.dll, libchicken_gui.dll, and libuchicken.dll. The
lack of consistency in prefixing is confusing.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
- [Chicken-users] Windows binary manifest,
Brandon J. Van Every <=