|
From: | Alex Shinn |
Subject: | [Chicken-users] complex number procedures |
Date: | Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:29:14 -0600 |
User-agent: | Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
Hi! Wishlist: the following definitions are reasonable in a Scheme without imaginary numbers: (define (real-part x) x) (define (imag-part x) 0) (define magnitude abs) (define (angle x) 0) If these were provided in the core it would be easier to write code that works regardless of whether or not the numbers egg is being used. -- Alex
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |