[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] read-byte, etc.
From: |
F. Wittenberger |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] read-byte, etc. |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:14:49 +0200 |
My $0.02: I wouldn't use an i/o operation to messure the delta of a
lexical vs. global lookup. Too long and unpredictable.
I'd be interested in a comparision calling (lambda(x)x) either way.
Am Donnerstag, den 06.04.2006, 14:14 +0200 schrieb Hans Bulfone:
> hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:34:16AM -0500, Alex Shinn wrote:
> > At Mon, 3 Apr 2006 13:11:05 +0200, Hans Bulfone wrote:
> > >
> > > i would have also expected this version to be slightly
> > > faster because read-char doesn't need to be looked up
> > > on every invokation... but it got slightly slower;
> > > can anybody explain why?
> >
> > Did you change anything else?
>
> no.
>
> regards,
> hans.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
>
- Re: [Chicken-users] read-byte, etc., Hans Bulfone, 2006/04/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] read-byte, etc., Alex Shinn, 2006/04/04
- Re: [Chicken-users] read-byte, etc., Hans Bulfone, 2006/04/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] read-byte, etc.,
F. Wittenberger <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] read-byte, etc., Alex Shinn, 2006/04/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] read-byte, etc., Benedikt Rosenau, 2006/04/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] read-byte, etc., felix winkelmann, 2006/04/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] read-byte, etc., Hans Bulfone, 2006/04/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] read-byte, etc., felix winkelmann, 2006/04/20