[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy
From: |
Dan Muresan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Dec 2006 20:47:22 +0200 |
Oh yeah, now I remember: handlers (defined with http:add-resource or
the spiffy helper macro) don't receive POST attributes in the the
second argument (the args in (lambda (req args)).
The built-in http:content-parser 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded
parses POSTs just fine. But read-request puts the parsed pairs in the
request body (which is supposed to be a string, not an a-list in any
case), not in the arguments arguments. It looks like somewhere along
the road internal conventions have changed...
--
Dan Muresan
http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~muresan/
- [Chicken-users] Spiffy, Dan Muresan, 2006/12/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy, Peter Bex, 2006/12/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy,
Dan Muresan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy, Dan Muresan, 2006/12/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy, felix winkelmann, 2006/12/10
- [Chicken-users] bugtracking and open source labor, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] bugtracking and open source labor, Arto Bendiken, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] bugtracking and open source labor, Richard Lewis, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] bugtracking and open source labor, felix winkelmann, 2006/12/11
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] bugtracking and open source labor, Arto Bendiken, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] bugtracking and open source labor, Toby Butzon, 2006/12/11
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] bugtracking and open source labor, Arto Bendiken, 2006/12/11
- Re: [Chicken-users] bugtracking and open source labor, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/12/11