[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] opengl egg naming scheme
From: |
Kon Lovett |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] opengl egg naming scheme |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:51:27 -0800 |
On Feb 27, 2007, at 10:53 AM, minh thu wrote:
Hi,
At the beginning of my journey with Chicken, I stolen the opengl egg
and repacked it: I changed its naming gl:UpperCase in glAsInC.
Now I have code I'd like to share that depends on the glAsInC naming.
It would not be very difficult for me to change it but I find it ugly.
Is there any rationale to keep/change the extant egg ? To provide a
new one ?
Or is it possible to use the extant egg (the one with gl:Naming) but
use it as if it was named glLikeThis ?
(define glAsInC gl:UpperCase)
Felix's naming for the glut & opengl eggs is a little odd in that he
follows the C binding CamlCase style - not the Scheme way, especially
since Scheme, up thru R5RS, is case-insensitive.
(See http://community.schemewiki.org/?variable-naming-convention)
Best Wishes,
Kon
Thanks,
thu
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users