chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] parameter limit


From: sramsay
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] parameter limit
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:54:29 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

Hi all,

On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:17:57AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
> sxml-tools uses the rather questionable idiom of "(apply append"
> and "(apply string-append" at various places, which (I believe) is
> repsonsible for the argument limit error.
> 
> I have uploaded a new version (1.2) that uses "concatenate" and
> "string-concatenate", respectively and seems to pass the test-suites.
> 
> Please give it a try (with an unmodified chicken), since raising the
> argument limit not really eliminates the problem (just pospones it).

Sorry to be getting back so late on this.  I've rebuilt an unmodified
chicken (leaving the parameter limit at 1000), and it seems to work
just fine with version 1.2 of sxml-tools.  Thanks, Felix!

While we're on the subject of XML processing . . .

I notice that sxml-tools doesn't implement the sxml:document procedure
(or at least, I can't find it in any of the XML-related packages).
This seems like a very useful function, because it can handle either
files or URIs.

Is there anything to prevent me from just patching this code in?

http://modis.ispras.ru/Lizorkin/Apidoc/xlink.html#codefunc35033

And if so, would it be useful to send such a patch to the maintainer
of the sxml-tools package?

Thanks again.

Steve


-- 
Stephen Ramsay
Assistant Professor
Department of English
Center for Digital Research in the Humanities
University of Nebraska at Lincoln
PGP Public Key ID: 0xA38D7B11
http://lenz.unl.edu/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]