[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: MacOS X is its' own beast
From: |
Raffael Cavallaro |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: MacOS X is its' own beast |
Date: |
Wed, 16 May 2007 10:57:48 -0400 |
On May 16, 2007, at 3:55 AM, Thomas Christian Chust wrote:
But I would consider the Mach interfaces internal API and
only the BSD, Carbon and Cocoa interfaces public API, because it would
be pretty tedious to write anything useful using only the Mach
interfaces and because otherwise I also would have to claim that
Carbon
and Cocoa are not native APIs on MacOS X but rather compatibility
layers
for MacOS <=9 and OpenStep just like the BSD subsystem is a
compatibility layer for other UNIX flavors.
This is really just a matter of marketing. Apple now considers Mac OS
X "Unix" and considers BSD and X11 core OS components:
<http://developer.apple.com/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/
OSX_Technology_Overview/SystemTechnology/chapter_4_section_2.html#//
apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40001067-CH207-TPXREF101>
but those who have been using Mac OS X since the first releases
remember that the BSD subsystem used to be an *optional* install in
early versions of Mac OS X. There were many early Mac OS X machines
which had no BSD subsystem on them at all.
Similarly, Apple lists Java support in the Core OS section,
presumably because that document:
<http://developer.apple.com/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/
OSX_Technology_Overview/SystemTechnology/chapter_4_section_2.html#//
apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40001067-CH207-BCIEHIBD>
was first written when Apple was at pains to give the appearance that
Mac OS X was a great platform for doing Java development.
But this more recent diagram shows Java (probably more properly) as a
much higher level Application Framework on their System Architecture
page, no doubt because Apple no longer cares nearly as much about
marketing Mac OS as a Java platform:
<http://developer.apple.com/macosx/architecture/index.html>
The reality (as seen in chapter 2 of Amit Singh's Mac OS X Internals)
is that everything is built more or less in layers:
Hardware
Firmware
Kernel
Mach
BSD
Core Services and JVM
Graphics/Multimedia (OpenGL, Quartz, Core Audio, Core MIDI, QuickTime)
Application Environments (Classic, X11, Carbon, Cocoa, WebObject,
Quicktime, Java AWT, Swing)
GUI (Aqua)
Apple considers all of Core Services/Carbon, Cocoa, and Quicktime
(but not Java) to be "native" APIs.
Raffael Cavallaro, Ph.D.
address@hidden
- Re: [Chicken-users] file-exists? on Windows, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] file-exists? on Windows, John Cowan, 2007/05/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] file-exists? on Windows, Alex Queiroz, 2007/05/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] file-exists? on Windows, Kon Lovett, 2007/05/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] file-exists? on Windows, Alex Queiroz, 2007/05/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] file-exists? on Windows, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2007/05/14
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-users] file-exists? on Windows, Kon Lovett, 2007/05/14
- Re: [Chicken-users] file-exists? on Windows, felix winkelmann, 2007/05/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] file-exists? on Windows, Thomas Christian Chust, 2007/05/15
- [Chicken-users] MacOS X is its' own beast, Kon Lovett, 2007/05/15
- [Chicken-users] Re: MacOS X is its' own beast, Thomas Christian Chust, 2007/05/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: MacOS X is its' own beast,
Raffael Cavallaro <=
Re: [Chicken-users] file-exists? on Windows, felix winkelmann, 2007/05/16