|
From: | Elf |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] Re: A few questions |
Date: | Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:09:14 -0800 (PST) |
im aware of the various srfis on the matter. thats one of the things i was griping about earlier. receive is entirely counterintuitive... one extra set of parens around the vars and producer would make it so much easier to follow. let-values is a nicer solution to the problem but still somewhat confusing. i dislike srfi-71.
i take the number of srfi's relating to binding (values ...) clauses in different ways as evidence of its confusing and unnecessary nature. :)
-elf On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, John Cowan wrote:
Scripsi:See SRFI 8, which Chicken implements and which is designed to make receiving multiple values very easy.SRFI-11 (which provides let-values and let*-values) and SRFI-71 (which nicely extends let and let*) are more advanced solutions to this problem: there don't seem to be Chicken implementations, though.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |