[Chicken-users] Re: My language trajectory

[Ivan Shmakov]

>>>>> F Wittenberger <Jörg> writes:

 > OK, here mine

 > pre-university:

 > Z-80 machine code (self designed/soldered computer [Screen: 32x8
 > characters each 6 bit - save chips save money]; the assembler was me,
 > manually)

        Oh, my.

[...]

        So, here's mine (I'm not quite sure about the order, though):

        * BASIC (MK-85, Sinclair, QuickBasic, probably others);

        * Assembler (Z-80, x86; both superficial);

        * Fox-Pro, Pascal, Lisp, Forth (all superficial);

        * MS-DOS batch files; BASIC (QBasic);

        * C, Assembler (x86; a more real touch this time);

        * C++ (superficial);

        * Bourne Shell (Bash), Perl;

        * Make, TeX (LaTeX, Texinfo), Sed and Awk (all superficial);

        * POV-Ray (probably superficial; see, e. g., [1]);

        * Emacs Lisp (written a never published IRC client for Emacs),
          Scheme (umb-scheme, scheme48, SLIB);

        * M4, SQL (PostgreSQL);

        * PostScript (superficial);

        * Scheme (Chicken);

        * GNU Awk and GNU Make (a more real touch);

        * Tcl (with Tk, Tcl-Nap), Ocaml (superficial), GNU R;

        * Assembler (AVR; written an ATtiny13-based polyphonic music box
          and an ATmega48-based frequency meter.)

        (I deliberately excluded any mark-up languages, such as HTML, as
        they aren't programming languages.)

[1] http://theory.asu.ru/~ivan/graphic/