[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:26:30 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Graham Fawcett scripsit:
> Just curious, whence the 'restricted' terminology? I would have
> thought 'utf8 and raw/byte strings' since that's the practical
> implication.
Restricted strings are restricted to holding characters between #\x0
and #\xFF. Unrestricted strings can hold any character between #\x0
and #x\u10FFFF. Chicken characters in fact go up to #x\u1FFFFF.
This says nothing about implementation, just interface.
Byte vectors, as distinct from restricted strings, hold integers in the
range 0 to 255.
--
One Word to write them all, John Cowan <address@hidden>
One Access to find them, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
One Excel to count them all,
And thus to Windows bind them. --Mike Champion
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, John Cowan, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, Tobia Conforto, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, John Cowan, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, Tobia Conforto, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, John Cowan, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, Shawn Rutledge, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, John Cowan, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, Shawn Rutledge, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, John Cowan, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, Graham Fawcett, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, Alex Shinn, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, felix winkelmann, 2008/03/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, John Cowan, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, Tobia Conforto, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, John Cowan, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, Alaric Snell-Pym, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, John Cowan, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, Graham Fawcett, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, Kon Lovett, 2008/03/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg, John Cowan, 2008/03/18