[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] SRFI-34 egg
From: |
F. Wittenberger |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] SRFI-34 egg |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:03:28 +0200 |
Hello,
I attach two implementations of srfi-34's "guard" syntax. (Depending
only of srfi-18; no additional procedures.)
I'd like to ask Elf, or whoever can do so and cares, to update the egg
(since the version there is broken).
However I'm left with a question: which version would one prefer? So
far I've got (from watching the mailing list) the feeling that
define-macro and define-syntax don't play well together.
Also I'm unsure whether all programs using define-syntax macros need to
require syntax-case, do they? If so, would there be trouble with
define-macro in those files?
If it was better to have both versions available, the define-macro
version for compatibility and define-syntax for the upcoming hygienic
chicken, then: how should this be handled? Two eggs?
Best regards
/Jörg
guard-defmacro.scm
Description: Text Data
guard-syntax.scm
Description: Text Data
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Chicken-users] SRFI-34 egg,
F. Wittenberger <=