[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?
|
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:40:39 -0500 |
As a comparison, Felix's solution performs equivalently to my alist
example when compiled, but runs much faster from the REPL. It also
uses 9MB instead of 13MB. It's also simpler.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 4:06 AM, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> This should perform much better and more closely
> resembles what you are trying to achieve.
- Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Elf, 2008/08/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Elf, 2008/08/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?,
Jim Ursetto <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Matt Welland, 2008/08/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Tobia Conforto, 2008/08/25