[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:16:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:07:59AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Since escaping backslashes inside string literals can get tedious,
> I wondered wether a non-escaping string-syntax might be handy.
> Something like:
>
> #" ... " (doesn't treat backslashes special, with the
> exception of \")
>
> Any alternative suggestions?
Don't we already have that, as the heredoc syntax?
Could you give an example in which you need this?
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
pgpEm0CmKrvHS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings,
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Alex Shinn, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Peter Bex, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Alex Shinn, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Tobia Conforto, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Alex Shinn, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Peter Bex, 2008/10/10
Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/10
Re: [Chicken-users] "raw" strings, Tobia Conforto, 2008/10/10