[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C

From: Rick R
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:30:17 -0500

It would also appear that MLton uses its own GC.
Both compilers do fufill the 2nd requirement of using unboxed
numberics and arrays for fast math.

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:21 PM, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> felix winkelmann scripsit:
>> Note that crunch is highly experimental and incomplete. You requirements
>> are tough, and you will not find many functional languages that don't require
>> GC. Stalin and MLton come to mind (perhaps one can make GC at least
>> unlikely, or reduce it to a minimum).
> Stalin uses the Boehm conservative GC.
> --
> By Elbereth and Luthien the Fair, you shall     address@hidden
> have neither the Ring nor me!  --Frodo

We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used
when we created them.
    - A. Einstein

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]