[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] dev-snapshot 4.6.3
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] dev-snapshot 4.6.3 |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:35:19 -0400 |
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Felix
<address@hidden> wrote:
> - the `regex' library unit has been removed and is separately
> available as an extension which should be fully backwards-
> compatible
> - `irregex' is now a core library unit and replaces the
> `regex' API
I understand the merits of reducing core dependencies, but have
performance comparisons been made? The last I heard, irregex was
*much* slower than regex.
- [Chicken-users] dev-snapshot 4.6.3, Felix, 2010/10/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] dev-snapshot 4.6.3,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] dev-snapshot 4.6.3, Jim Ursetto, 2010/10/07
- [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly [Was: Re: dev-snapshot 4.6.3], Peter Bex, 2010/10/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly [Was: Re: dev-snapshot 4.6.3], Jim Ursetto, 2010/10/07
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly [Was: Re: dev-snapshot 4.6.3], Peter Bex, 2010/10/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly [Was: Re: dev-snapshot 4.6.3], Peter Bex, 2010/10/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly [Was: Re: dev-snapshot 4.6.3], Jim Ursetto, 2010/10/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly [Was: Re: dev-snapshot 4.6.3], Jim Ursetto, 2010/10/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] Using irregex safely & responsibly, Felix, 2010/10/08